Eighteen media buyers told Digiday that clients no longer treat Google search spend as automatic, PPC Land reported on November 2, with contested slices of Google budgets put at 10 to 30 percent and some buyers seeing 10 to 30 percent reallocated. The report landed on the same day Google moved AI Overviews for brand searches into the right-hand column, and it captures a mood shift among the people who actually allocate search budgets: Google is still the default, but it is no longer unquestioned.
Digiday spoke to 18 media buyers, and the message was consistent even if the numbers varied. Clients are questioning a slice of their Google search budgets that used to pass without discussion, and some buyers have already seen money move elsewhere. The reported ranges, 10 to 20 percent of the Google budget contested in some accounts and 10 to 30 percent reallocated in one buyer's experience, are not a market statistic. They are a summary of conversations with buyers, and they should be read as a signal of scrutiny, not as a precise measurement of spend movement.
The context for that scrutiny is AI search. When AI Overviews answer a query on the results page, and AI Mode answers it in conversation, the value of a paid click changes, and so does the value of an organic ranking. Advertisers who once measured search by clicks and conversions are now asking what they are paying for when the answer itself satisfies the user. That question does not have a settled answer yet, which is exactly why budgets are being questioned rather than simply cut.
The Digiday report arrived in a week when Google's own numbers gave buyers reason to ask hard questions. Google's search advertising grew 12 percent year over year in the third quarter, to 63.3 billion dollars, but that was the slowest pace of the year, and Google's chief business officer said AI Mode's lower monetisation had weighed on growth. Alphabet shares fell sharply after the results. A buyer does not need to understand AI Mode's economics in detail to notice that the product is changing and the returns are less certain than they were.
The brand AI Overview move added to the scrutiny. When a brand's own search result is answered by an AI summary in the right-hand column, in the space where a knowledge panel used to sit, the brand's paid and organic presence on that query is no longer the only story. Buyers are asking whether they should pay to appear beside an answer that already mentions their brand, whether that answer is accurate, and whether the click they buy is still worth what it was. Those are reasonable questions, and they do not have standard answers yet.
For advertisers, the practical response is measurement, not panic. Separate brand queries from non-brand queries, separate AI Overview queries from classic queries where the data allows, and track what actually happens after a click, not just the click itself. If a slice of spend is contested, that slice should be the one with the weakest evidence of incremental value, not the one that is easiest to cut. Cutting brand spend to save money, only to lose the query to a competitor or to an AI answer, is a false economy.
Advertisers should also renegotiate what they ask agencies to report. A report that shows impressions, clicks, and cost per click, without any view of AI answer presence, citation, or incremental conversions, is no longer sufficient for a search budget. The buyers in the Digiday report are not abandoning Google. They are asking for a better account of what Google search does now, and agencies that can provide that account will keep the budget. Those that cannot will watch it move.
For SEOs, the buyer scrutiny is an opportunity disguised as a threat. If paid budgets are questioned, organic and earned visibility become more valuable, provided they can be measured in the same terms: incremental visits, conversions, and brand mentions in AI answers. SEOs who can show that a page is cited in AI Overviews, that it drives qualified visits, and that it supports brand queries will be speaking the language buyers now use. SEOs who report only rankings will sound like the old budget: automatic, and therefore questionable.
For link builders, the same logic applies. Links and mentions that support brand queries, that appear in AI citations, and that drive real referral traffic are defensible spend. Links bought for a ranking alone, with no story about who sees them or what they do, will face the same scrutiny as the paid budgets in the Digiday report. The market is not turning against search. It is turning against search spend that cannot explain itself.
Sources: Digiday, November 2, 2026, as reported by PPC Land.
Linkbaits helps you create content that earns citations and backlinks. Start with the free tools and build your first linkable asset this week.
Start free trial